Feet Out, Knees Out, Squat It Out

Feet Out, Knees Out, Squat It Out

By David Kathmann, MS, RSCC, CSCS, NSCA-CPT

Written on May 5, 2013

---

         “Feet out, Knees out . . . Knees OUT, OUT, OUT!” This is commonly what those who train with us hear when they are squatting.  But wait, could they be hearing this right? Feet out? Knees out?  The overwhelming majority of personal trainers, strength coaches, fitness gurus and fitness magazines (the list is much larger than this, trust me) are telling people to squat with toes straight ahead and knees tracking in-line with their toes. This teaching of the squat is incorrect and leads to an awful, mutilated appearance of a squat. And let me state that you don’t get to call an exercise harmful when you perform the exercise incorrectly.

           

            A squat not performed to parallel depth, which is measured by the crease of your hip being level with the top of your knee, is not a squat; it is a fraction of the squat.  Anything higher than parallel depth can be called a quarter (1/4) squat, a half (1/2) squat, a nine-tenths (9/10) squat, but it is still not a squat. Of course, there are other guidelines that must be adhered to in order to maintain safety while squatting.  These guidelines include a neutral lumbar spine (low back), heels flat on the ground, knees in-line with the toes and weight distributed evenly on your mid-foot.

Proper squat depth: crease of the hip level with the top of the knee

            Keeping these guidelines in mind, it is nearly impossible to squat to proper depth with feet straight ahead (neutral) stance and retain safety of the lift.  In every case I’ve encountered, those who have been taught a neutral foot position can only perform a 1/2 squat and maintain a neutral spine. Any attempt to squat deeper with a neutral stance will lead to the lumbar spine rounding. The reason for this is simple, attempting to squat to proper depth with a neutral stance will cause impingement (to collide) of your anatomical structures (e.g. thighs, stomach, and ASIS of your hip) and it becomes impossible to squat to proper depth while maintaining a neutral lumbar spine.  A relaxation of the erector spinae (muscle running straight down your back) and shortening of the hamstrings leads to a rounding of the lumbar spine to get deeper and this is a no-no.

           

            Some may argue that it is inflexibility that stops someone from squatting deeper with a neutral foot position while maintaining a neutral spine, but I assure you its your anatomy. Also, some may argue that if a 1/2 squat is where your body stops you, then that is as far as you need to go down, but again, I assure you they are wrong.

           

            Now, let me take my stance and provide you with why toes out, knees out is the optimal position for squatting.  First, squatting to proper depth (as described above) is optimal in order to get the most muscle activity from all of your main squatting muscles (e.g. quads, hamstrings and glutes), especially your powerful glutes (butt) and adductor muscles (1,3). A squat higher than proper depth is inferior in regards to muscle activity. I want to highlight a point here, adductor muscle (muscles on the inner part of your leg) activity is seen when feet are pointed out (30^o) and knees are pushed out (in-line with toes, 3), but not with a neutral foot stance. The reason is because the adductors help in hip extension (opening the hip up) and some of those muscles aid in external rotation of the leg. Adductor activity is also seen with a widening of the stance, but the extensibility of the adductor muscles and the ability to keep knees out may be compromised causing the knees to cave in; which can stress the knee ligaments negatively. The gluteus maximus activity also increased with an increase in stance. This (gluteus maximus activity) isn’t surprising because actions of the gluteus maximus are external rotation and abduction (stance widening) of the legs. These movements (as well as hip extension) also occur with the cue “toes out, knees out”.

           

Big squat weights have been moved with feet out, knees out

            Secondly, more muscle involvement over a wider range of motion will allow for more weight lifted, more distribution of the load, and a greater systemic strengthening and adaptation response.  This simply means you’ll be stronger, not just in the legs, but all over your body. An increase in the weight of the bar (e.g. getting stronger) also increases activation of the leg and trunk musculature (2,4; see my previous thoughts on trunk muscle activity). Also, the ability to stretch your muscles over a wider range of motion “activates” them more and induces a greater stretch-reflex, which will aid in lifting the weight up and to lift more weight.

           

            Thirdly, as mentioned above, the knees out position opens up space in your hips to allow you to squat to proper depth without impinging your anatomical structures; thus, allowing maintenance of a neutral lumbar spine (if the hamstrings are kept tight with hips staying back) throughout the squat.  Speaking of anatomical structures, in the majority of the population the femur bone is straight.  While standing straight up with the feet under the hips, the femur lines up with the tibia and the knee is tracking in-line with the foot.  If you perform a half squat from this position the femur remains in-line with the knee, which is tracking in-line with the feet.

           

            Now try this, widen your stance to shoulder width (or to some comfortable position in that area) and keep your feet neutral (pointed forward).  Squat down to proper depth and put your arms on the inside part of your legs and push out with your arms straight and fingers pointed in the direction of your femur. Which direction are your arms and hands (and subsequently your knees) pointing and which direction are your feet pointed? They are pointing in different directions! This implies then that the knee is somewhere in-between and is being twisted (torqued) along with the ligaments in the knee.  I don’t know about you, but I like to keep my knees healthy, neutral, and in-line with all the other structures of my leg.

Toes straight and knees out doesn’t line up

           I bet that your feet are straining to move into the position they want to be in, which is where? You should be observing about 30^o out.  Let them move out to where they want to be and put your arms and hands back on the inside part of your leg and push out like you did before and is everything lined up? Does the knee feel less strained?  The pushing out of the legs represents the conscience effort to keep your knees pushed out when you are squatting and to maintain alignment of the upper leg with the knee to the lower leg. If one of the jobs of the glutes is to help in keeping the legs out and tracking of the knees in-line with the feet pointed out, then why does everyone try to fight this with feet forward? Use your anatomy to your advantage.

Toes out and knees out allows for a proper squat

            Lastly, by keeping the feet out and knees out, this allows proper squat technique and depth allowing the hamstrings to be utilized and kept tight.  As mentioned before, a feet forward position impinges anatomical structures and does not allow proper depth to be achieved unless the low back and hamstrings relax.  The ability to avoid impingement allows the hamstrings to be kept taught and pull back on tibia allowing the knee to remain neutral with no excessive pull from the quads.  An excessive pull from the quads typically causes the knee pain people get from squatting, which implies improper squatting technique.

           

            If you are not squatting with proper technique then you are wasting your time, utilizing an inferior technique, and have a higher possibility of injury.  The squat has been shown to be highly correlated to many different athletic skills (e.g. top speed running and lower body power) and provides a solid base to advance on to different skills, but only when performed optimally.  Our ability to teach many people how to squat properly, increase squat strength and remain injury free at Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning is nothing extraordinary, but rather a result of proper coaching technique. At Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning, we will make sure you utilize proper squatting technique all the time and you’ll notice the significant improvements as you continue to reach strength levels you didn’t think were possible. If you think your training form is suffering and holding you back, we offer form checks to improve your technique and allow your training to be taken to the next level!

Disclaimer: Some photos in this article are not property of Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning and are intended only for visual entertainment.

References

1. Caterisano, A.; Moss, R.F.; Pellinger, T.K.; Woodruff, K.; Lewis, V.C.; Booth, W., and Khadra, T. The Effect of Back Squat Depth on the EMG Activity of 4 Superficial Hip and Thigh Muscles. J Strength Cond Res 16: 428-432; 2002.

2. Paoli, A.; Marcolin, G.; and Petrone, N. The Effect of Stance Width on the Electromyographical Activity of Eight Superficial Thigh Muscles During Back Squat with Different Bar Loads. J Strength Cond Res 23: 246-250, 2009.

3. Pereira, G.R.; Leporace, G.; Chagas, D.V.; Furtado, L.F.L.; Praxedes, J., and Batista, L.A. Influence of Hip External Rotation on Hip Adductor and Rectus Femoris Myoelectric Activity During a Dynamic Parallel Squat. J Strength Cond Res 24(10): 2749-2754, 2010.

4. Wretenberg, P.E.R.; Feng, Y.I.; and Arborelius, U.P. High- and Low-Bar Squatting Techniques During Weight-Training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28: 218-224, 1996.

 2012 Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning www.pfstrength.com     

Muscle Confusion Cleared Up

          

Muscle Confusion Cleared Up

By David Kathmann, MS, RSCC, CSCS, NSCA-CPT

Written on March 6, 2013

---

  What is more confusing about muscle confusion is why someone would want to confuse their muscles, confused yet? I’ve heard it many times before that people think they need to trick their muscles in order to keep them from getting stuck in a rut that will inhibit progress. Well I’m here to clear up the confusion.

            Muscles don’t like to be confused, they want to know how you will stress them so that they can adapt to the stress (e.g. your training) and become stronger and bigger (to an extent).  However, if you don’t change anything with your training, then yes your muscles will go nowhere because they have done their job in adapting to the stress you imposed upon them.  You know the sore feeling you get when you start a new exercise, like squatting for the first time for many people? That soreness is a necessary biological adaptation and is called DOMS (Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness). This soreness occurs with eccentric stress (the lengthening of a muscle under a load) and causes microscopic tears in the muscle. The body detects these tears and sends in white blood cells to clean up the mess (inflammation and perceived soreness) and begins to rebuild the muscle stronger, so that when the same stress (e.g. barbell weight) is applied to your body your muscles can handle the stress and not break down. Basically, you’ve become stronger, more resilient to stress.       

Some know this feeling all to well the days after their first squat

           

           Now that your muscles have adapted to the imposed stress of a previous workout, the only way to cause them to adapt further is to stress them more. This means to perform the same exercise, but now increase some aspect of your training that your body isn’t adapted too.  Now here is where a lot of people start training incorrectly or are given incorrect information from an inexperienced personal trainer.  They perform the same exercises with the same weights, sets, and reps, but this time they don’t get sore.  So, what do they do next time? They enormously increase something in regards to weight, reps, or sets. The next few days leave the trainee crippled in soreness; as well as drain the neuromuscular system (nervous system controlling your muscles). This type of training is not only painful, but gets no results and could eventually lead to injury. 

            Constant soreness should not be an indicator of the effectiveness of a training program. The body can only handle so much stress before it breaks down.  This can be equated to driving a car.  If you constantly drive a car in the red zone of its tachometer, what will eventually happen? The car’s engine will blow up. The same goes for you body; if you constantly train hard and stress the body too much, in the equivalent red zone of your body, eventually you will “blow up”.

            Here is what should happen after the initial soreness has subsided. Since your body has adapted to the previously imposed stress from your last workout, you should increase some aspect of your training gradually (linear progression).  For example, this could mean increasing your squat weight by 5 – 20 pounds total, adding in another set, or increasing the reps by 2 or 3; but only choose one.  This will stress the body again and cause it to adapt to previously unaccustomed stress, but not leave you cursing the stairs the next few days. You continue this process until programming must be more meticulously planned in order to keep progress going.  You’ll notice that along the way you’ve made some incredible progress and weren’t really that sore, but why? Because you didn’t trick your muscles. They (the muscles) knew exactly what they had to do in order to keep getting stronger and, depending on nutrition and hormone status (sorry ladies, but the myth that you will gain an incredible amount of muscles size has been busted time and time again due to the lack of testosterone females produce), bigger.

No more excuses ladies: "Strong is the new skinny!"

           Would this strength and muscle size progress occurred if you tricked your muscles every workout or even every other week? Not even close. All that would happen is that you’d be constantly sore and frustrated by the lack of progress. If you constantly confused your muscles by performing new workouts each time you stepped in the gym or new exercises every couple of weeks and abandoning the old ones, then you basically start at square one each time you change your training routine. You make no progress if you are always starting over, but you will be sore. However, variations of certain exercises have their place and if you don’t know where that place is yet, then you need to worry about getting stronger first.

            People that have trained with us at Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning can attest to the incredible progress they’ve made with their training. Not only can our clients mentally prepare for their training session by knowing what to expect, but (aside from the initial learning stages of training) aren’t always sore, while crushing personal bests with their weights. It is this consistent progress that keeps people motivated and, yes, it may be more fun to keep things fresh and new with each workout, but save that for something like a conditioning circuit.  In the mean time, continue to progress on the exercises your muscles can expect you to train and relish in your continued progress each time you set foot in the gym.

Disclaimer: All photos in this article are not property of Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning and are intended only for visual entertainment.    

 2012 Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning www.pfstrength.com     

Strengthen Your Cycling

Strengthen Your Cycling

By David Kathmann, MS, RSCC, CSCS, NSCA-CPT

Written on January 28, 2013

---

So you like to cycle and are probably a little competitive, whether it is on the weekend with a few friends, training for a few events each year, or on the national level.  Everyone is always looking for the competitive edge over their opponent.  That edge can be altering your nutrition, your total hours spent on the saddle, the sweat you pour during hill intervals, and recovery between rides.  However, a highly overlooked and shunned aspect of training for cycling is lifting weights.  I’m not talking about high repetition weight lifting with light weights performed in a circuit with incomplete rest intervals that focuses on endurance and “toning”.  I’m talking about lifting heavy weights (relatively speaking for each individual), like squats, deadlifts, pull ups, and power cleans, for low repetitions that focuses on significantly improving your absolute strength levels. Before you stop reading and think I’m trying to make you into the next Arnold Schwarzenegger with enormous, bulging muscles, hear me out. 

Let’s first cover a few definitions to make sure we are on the same page, starting with the term “strength.” Strength is the ability of your muscles to exert force against an external resistance.  In cycling, strength is used when you drive your pedals down with your legs. Strength is also like pushing against the ground while performing a squat. In order to build your strength, you need to find an external stimulus that makes your body work harder than it is accustomed to. Another pair of definitions I’d like to cover is “work” and “power.”  Work is defined as force multiplied by distance (F x D). The more force you apply over a set distance, the more work you complete. Power is defined as work divided by time (W / T). The more work you perform over a set time, the more powerful you are. There are plenty more physics definitions I won’t bore you with, but those are some important ones. How does this apply to cycling, and, more importantly, you? 

SRM training device is a tool that measures cycling power

Consider this, the person who is able to apply the most force over a set distance (works hardest) and is most powerful (works fastest) wins the race. Basically, the rider who is the strongest and most efficient relative to his or her bodyweight will win the race. (Yes, endurance is important too, but is beyond the scope of this article). I’ll provide an example.  Why can a male, typically (not always), beat a female in a head-to-head cycling race? A few reasons, first, males have a VO_2max advantage. A VO_2max is a measure of one’s endurance or the maximal ability of the body to utilize oxygen. Males have bigger hearts, have bigger lungs, have less body fat, have more muscle mass, and are typically stronger. Let’s look at the muscle mass and strength advantage because, ultimately, it is your muscles that move the bike.  More muscle mass and strength allows men to apply more force into pedaling, propelling them further with each stroke. The reason males are stronger and have more muscle mass is because they have more testosterone. Here’s another example: Why do cycling organizations test for steroids and testosterone? Steroids (a precursor to testosterone) aid in recovery and help boost your red blood cell count, but also make the user stronger, providing an unfair advantage. If strength didn’t matter in cycling, then steroids and testosterone would be allowed.  

  

If you still believe lifting heavy weights will slow you down on the bike, let me present you with some research.  In 2010, a review found that implementing heavy strength training (along with endurance training) for a highly trained National Cycling Team resulted in an improvement of short-term and long-term endurance capacity, and improved their time trial performance (1; additional research, 2).  This group did not have a significant gain in muscle mass, nor did they have a decrease in muscle capillary density (the amount of blood getting to your muscles), but they improved their strength and power. This improvement in short- and long-term endurance capacity has also been seen in untrained and moderately trained cyclists, but only when performing strength training at a high intensity (at least 80% of your 1 repetition max). The reason strength training improves endurance capacity is because strength training improves the neuromuscular system, the connection and function of your nerves to your muscles.  In turn, every contraction of the muscles is more forceful, which means more force being placed into your pedal strokes.

You will still look like this while lifting heavy weights

Not like this . . . I promise

            Strength training causes an improvement in movement economy too. This means that it takes less effort to maintain a certain power output. This is because you are stronger and every stroke of the pedal is at a smaller percentage of your maximal strength. Since you are stronger, this movement is a much smaller percentage than before. If you are worried that lifting heavy weights will make you look like a meathead, take heed, because an important note in this study is that there was no significant increase in body mass because the endurance side of training requires thousands of calories and when you are in a calorie deficit, even when lifting heavy weights, you cannot gain mass.

Do you want to know something even more mind blowing? Another study on competitive cyclists found that replacing hours on the bike with time spent in the weight room performing explosive movements (e.g. plyo box jumps) also improves short- and long-term endurance capacity on the bike (3).  So, if you were worried there wouldn’t be enough time in your busy schedule to put in your hours on the bike and lift weights, well you’re in luck because you can replace some hours on the bike with an hour or less in the weight room and actually improve your cycling performance. 

If you put a bigger engine in a car (let’s say trading in your Honda’s V6 for an Aston Martin V12), which obviously weighs more, does it slow the car down? Of course not!  The car is faster. Thus, if you add even a few pounds of muscle mass (your body’s engine) to your body due to weightlifting and eating, odds are you will shock yourself and have an improvement in your cycling (4). This is because you have significantly improved your body mass to strength ratio due to weightlifting.

     Robert Foerstemann squats and it doesn't slow him down.            Look at those quads!

                         (Yes, I know he is a sprint cyclist)

           You cannot, I repeat, cannot gain a significant amount of muscle-mass without gaining a significant amount of strength. However, if you put on too much fat mass, then you will definitely slow down because fat mass is dead weight [junk in the trunk (of your car)] and doesn’t contribute to improving your cycling. “The ability to gain muscle mass and minimize fat mass” talk will be saved for another day or you can speak with us over at Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning.

                                             Robert Foerstemann squatting the house! (484 LBS)

Here at Pro Fit S&C, we tailor all programs to each individual’s goals and have the education and experience to reach those goals in the most effective manner. If you haven’t checked us out or even talked with us about your goals, then you are missing out on an important facet of your training.  We love talking about exercise and any related topic, I promise we don’t bite and a friendly conversation with us is always free! So what are you waiting for?! You might even learn a thing or two.  In the mean time, get under that barbell and start squatting your way to better cycling performance and let your competition watch those powerful glutes of yours as you leave them in your dust. 

Disclaimer: All photos in this article are not property of Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning and are intended only for visual entertainment.

REFERNCES

1. Aagaard, P. and Andersen, J. L. Effects of Strength Training on Endurance Capacity in Top-Level Endurance Athletes. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 20 (Suppl. 2): 39-47, 2010.  

2. Aagaard, P.; Andersen, J. L.; Bennekou, M.; Larsson, B.; Olesen, J. L.; Crameri, R.; Magnusson, S. P.; and Kjaer, M. Effects of Resistance Training On Endurance Capacity and Muscle Fiber Composition in Young Top-Level Cyclists. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 21: e298–e307, 2011.

3. Paton, C. D. and Hopkins, W. G. Combining Explosive and High-Resistance Training Improves Performance in Competitive Cyclists. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19(4): 826-830, 2005.

4. Martin, J.C.; Davidson, C.J. and Pardyjak, E.R. Understanding Sprint-Cycling Performance: The Integration of Muscle Power, Resistance, and Modeling. Int. J. Sports Phsy. Perf. 2: 5-21, 2007.

CORE...No More!!!

CORE…No More!!!

By David Kathmann, MS, RSCC, CSCS, NSCA-CPT

Written on January 2, 2013

---

I’m going to start off my blogging with an issue that comes around every year and applies to everyone from the mother of three to top tier athletes. Everyone wants “a tighter, stronger core”, “six pack abs”, “a toned midsection”, or whatever your favorite line is to strengthen up the midsection in time for summer. If one thing frustrates me more than anything in the world of strength and conditioning and personal training, it is the inability for trainers and strength coaches to think critically.  This is highly present in understanding how the body moves, especially in light of research and experience.  Many strength and conditioning coaches and personal trainers blindly follow the newest trends and don’t take the time to step back and critically think about the effectiveness of the hottest new piece of equipment or exercise.  One of the most overrated, useless, waste-of-time examples of this is isolated core exercises.                                                               

            

           Lets begin by laying out what some (not all inclusive) of the “core” (trunk; midsection) muscles are: rectus abdominis, external obliques, internal obliques, transverse abdominis, erector spinae, quadratus luborum, multifidus, longissimus thoracis, diaphragm, psoas major, illiacus, latissimus dorsi, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, trapezius, pelvic floor, … and the list goes on.  You see how much the “core” is connected with the rest of the body and which begs the question, “what is the function of the ‘core’?”.  The main function of the trunk musculature (“core”) is to stabilize the spine and translate force generated against the ground from the legs and hips on up.; not to lie on our toes and forearms (planks) or to flex our spine forward (crunches) in an attempt to get those washboard abs. Side note: if you want that elusive 6-pak, guess what, you already have it!  The only problem is that layers of fat cover those razor abs and the only way to get them to show through is a cleaner diet, but I digress.

So that is where your 6-pak has been hiding . . . inside of you.

            How then does one strengthen the trunk muscles without apparatuses such as the BOSU Ball?  Simple, use the body and trunk muscles as they are intended: as an entire unit.  This means to choose exercises that have you translate force from the legs and hips to your upper body and/or exercises that stabilize your spine. This includes main, compound exercises like squats, deadlifts, overhead presses, bench press (yes, bench press), pull ups, Olympics lifts (a.k.a. weightlifting in the Olympics; clean and jerk and snatch), and similar movements.  Most of these movements require you to translate force from your legs up your body and to the barbell, while maintaining a stable spine. I know that “core” exercises do in fact work your trunk muscles (based on EMG readings), but nowhere near the level that a relatively heavy squat or deadlift can. Also, these main exercises allow you to incrementally load the movements to not only progressively strengthen the trunk musculature, but the rest of the body as well.  However, I must note that these movements (the main exercises) are hard, much harder than a plank on a stability ball.  Also, there is some coaching and thinking involved in performing these movements correctly. If you already have a personal trainer and you are doing isolated core movements, then you may want to start looking for a new strength coach, because he/she either is too lazy to teach you how to train properly or doesn’t know how to teach the main exercises correctly. Either way, they don’t have your best interest in mind.

           

                                                       Arnold knows the benefits of squats. Do you?

There are exceptions regarding the ability to perform the main exercises, but a very limited amount.  If one movement is contraindicated for an individual for the time being, be it due to a surgery or some other existing “situation”, then the individual can most likely do some of the other movements pain-free. Of course, in my opinion, these people should have already been getting strong with the main exercises before the surgery or “situation” and deserve a little break, but I’m an idealist. Rarely is a person ever contraindicated from doing all the main, compound exercises for any extended period of time, but is only able to do “core” exercises.  Just doing one or two of the main exercises (at even 50% of a person’s 1 repetition max) can elicit far better trunk muscle strengthening than any glute bridge or quadruped extension (3).

            If you aren’t convinced that the main exercises mentioned above are sufficient enough to get your “core” strong, then 1) You haven’t had enough experience getting strong with the main exercises, so start getting stronger 2) Do your research homework (Check out the resources after this blog) and 3) Test yourself. I’ll provide you with an example you are familiar with, the leg press. How much can you leg press? The house, I bet.  There are probably not enough polyhexigonal plates in your gym to leg press because your legs are so strong.  Now, can you take that exact same weight you can leg

press and squat it? I’m going out on a limb and going to say, “No.”  Why not? You just proved your legs are strong enough to lift the weight, so why can’t you do it while standing up with a bar across your back?  Simple, you don’t have a stable, padded chair to help you out.  The reason you can’t squat more than you can leg press is because you have to support all the weight of the barbell and have to translate the force your strong legs can generate against the ground up (wait for it), yes, your trunk (a.k.a. that core you’ve been working on), to the bar on your back.  Squats require you to maintain a neutral, stable spine and work the trunk the way the muscles are suppose to work (force transfer and spine stabilization).  Be diligent in your training and keep adding weight each time you squat, and when you get your squat up to a respectable weight, you’ll notice your core is much stronger. Now, tell me how effective a superman, back extension is now!

                                    Don't be "that" guy who is "working" his core harder.

Here at Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning, we focus our training on getting the entire body stronger with the main, compound exercises, and use the body in unison, as it is intended for; not as isolated, individual parts.  This gives our clients an efficient, high quality workout with outstanding results.  If you don’t know where to start or need some high quality coaching to learn form and programming, then come see us at Pro Fit (training@pfstrength.com) and we will get you started in the right direction. So, stop sitting on your stability ball or stirring the pot or whatever you are trying to do to isolate and tone your “core” and get to training and getting stronger, all over!

Disclaimer: All photos in this article are not property of Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning and are intended only for visual entertainment.

References

1. Chulvi-Medrano, I., Garcia-Masso, X., Colado, J.C., Pablos, C., Alves de Moraes, J., and Fuster, M.A. Deadlift Muscle Force and Activation Under Stable and Unstable Conditions. J. Strength Cond. Res. 24(10): 2723-2730, 2010.

2. Hamlyn, N., Behm, D.G., and Young, W.B.  Trunk Muscle Activity During Dynamic Weight-Training Exercises and Isometric Instability Activities. J. Strength Cond. Res. 21(4): 1108-1112, 2012.

3. Nuzzo, J.L., McCaulley, G.O., Cormie, P., Cavill, M.J., and McBride, J.M. Trunk Muscle Activity During Stability Ball And Free Weight Exercises. J. Strength Cond. Res. 22(1): 95-102, 2008.

 2012 Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning www.pfstrength.com

ABOUT

OUR MISSION at Pro Fit Strength and Conditioning is to provide elite training superior coaching in an exclusive environment, at an afforfable cost, while enhancing our clients performance, and achieving their goals through sound techniques and practices.

ALL ABOUT PRO FIT S&C

Pro Fit Strength & Conditioning is a product of many years of passion, education and hard work. After many years of working with a wide range of "professionals", and seeing ineffective trainning, poor coaching, misinformation, a lack of education and common sense for proper, successful training, the necessity to fulfill a long time dream came about.

Our facility strives to change and correct the strength & conditioning and personal training perception, by teaching sound and educated techniques and training to achieve optimal results.

Our company prides itself by having only highly professional coaches as part of our team, who not only have the most prestigious certificactions, but also have higher education in the field of Exercise Science and real world experience training others, as well as ourselves.

We want to provide our clientele with the best service, coaches, equipment, environment, experience, training, and knowledge, at a price that is more competitive than any fitness establishment in the area.

Pro Fit S&C wants all our clients to have an athlete-based training experience, which is why our motto is based on the fact that "You don't have to be an athelete, to train like one". Athletic performance training not only helps you on the playing field, but also improves body composition (i.e. lose or gain weight), makes daily tasks (i.e. picking up objects) easier, and improves overall health factors (i.e. hormones, cholesterol, blood glucose, and blood pressure).

Our training is based on our education, experience, and willingness to provide wholesome practices based on scientific principles. The expertise of our trainers is extensive, and includes strength training, weight loss, weight gain, endurance training, power training, and specialized training for various sports.